3/31 assessment

Mission:
Answering the questions about the design of interrater reliability.
「施測者間信度」為不同施測者對相同對象施測所得結果的一致性，用以檢驗工具的評量結果是否受到施測者的主觀判斷影響。
1.Find out the advantage and disadvantage points?
代表性,可行性,有價值-->>basic point

2.Does this study design suitable with the clinical environment?
Ans:The number of the clinical therapists still need to complement, so the PEP-3 assessment couldn't have more than one rater(therapist) to take in.
The time spent to assess PEP-3 with 2 Raters comparing with one raters were almost similarly(about 30minutes), but may be related to the function level of the child.

3.Asking the clinicals T's about the efficiency of the study design?
Ans:Only one rater assess the examination will be suitable for clinical.

4.Find out the source's influence of the result?
Ans:T's experience,attitude and instructions will be the main influence of the result.

Other Q:
1.Find out the basic rule of different kinds interrater-reliability?
2.Writing out the inclusion and exclusion criteria?